Identifying the different stages that lead to a sale and defining the best internal organization to achieve it raises many questions. It's never a simple matter... And it's even less so for software vendors, whose economic and commercial model is currently being questioned as never before.
From "On Premise" to "SaaS": after the technological leap, take the plunge at the commercial level
Defining a company's business model is like designing a car's engine: if you neglect this step, you can provide it with all the fuel in the world afterward, but it is unlikely to move forward or win races!
In other words, to place your solution at the top of the « EY-Syntech top 250 » and before recruiting an army of salespeople ready to fight, make sure you know what they will have to do, and in what order!
An objective that is by no means insignificant in the specific context of software publishers...
While the advent of the Cloud was initially seen as a technological challenge with a strong business impact (developing or migrating solutions to SaaS mode), this was not its only impact.
The progressive shift from the "On-Premise" model (based on license sales, often accompanied by a maintenance service subscription) to the "SaaS" model (on a monthly subscription basis) has profoundly disrupted the economics of companies in the sector.
The impact on their cash flow has been enormous: where previously they could count on significant cash inflows from the sale and then rely on a long-term "annuity" through maintenance and updates, they now have to wait 3 to 4 years for a SaaS solution sold on subscription to achieve a turnover equivalent to that of its "On Premise" version!
The time it takes to make a solution profitable on the market is not the same as before! Especially since you also have to cover the R&D costs of this transition.
A new economic model has therefore been established. However, publishers have not always fully grasped the evolution that this also implies at the commercial level... Yet, in this area too, making the shift represents a real challenge.
What is the best sales organization for a software vendor today?
Of course, not all publishers are equal in terms of integrating the Cloud into their offering and their maturity on the subject of commercial transition that accompanies it. It is difficult to compare the situation of new "born in the cloud" entrants who rely heavily on their technological advantage with that of established players who have embraced the transition along the way...
What is certain is that even if 'On Premise' still largely dominates today (in terms of the overall turnover generated by the sector in France), the trend towards switching to SaaS is significant and irreversible.
And you don't sell a subscription to a SaaS solution in the same way as a licensed software: the characteristics (technical, usage, etc.) of the product sold are not the same, and neither are the sales arguments. The pricing structures are completely different. The priority is gradually shifting from acquisition to customer loyalty. And online demos are changing the relationship with the buyer.
The digitization of sales methods has gone hand in hand with that of the offer, and it does not only affect the world of software publishers.1 We have gradually witnessed the emergence of business models in which (Inbound) Marketing and Sales Automation occupy a prominent place. But paradoxically, publishers are not necessarily the most advanced on the subject... The famous syndrome of the "cobbler's children have no shoes"!
With few exceptions (pure Cloud players), the transition is gradual and the mixed model (both on the solutions sold and on the sales methods themselves) is even constantly evolving. With all the risks and uncertainties that this entails...
Software vendors, therefore, face the need to rethink their business model on a case-by-case basis. To do this, they need to answer many questions, including:
- 
- On which offers should we focus the most commercial effort (SaaS, Licenses, Maintenance, etc.)?
 
Defining priority customer targets, in particular, is a point to which it is useful to devote a lot of attention. Contrary to the intuitive approach that one might have in the first place (assigning "Gold" status to customers who have generated the largest sales revenue to date), a methodical and structured approach aims to cross-reference several criteria (company size, revenue generated, projects detected, etc.) in order to determine the development potential that each customer represents for you, the probability that you have of selling your products and services to them in the future. And to establish the ranking of your targets based on this criterion.
Taking some time to define a typology of clients as "Gold, Silver, and Bronze" will subsequently save you a great deal of efficiency in sales prospecting, improve the conversion rate of pursued deals, and therefore, ultimately, in generated revenue... At the same time, this work will form the basis of a clear and coherent distribution of the portfolio of prospects and clients among your various sales representatives.
This fundamental process must be structured and methodical to ensure the right choices are made. Ideally, these choices should be tested with iterative feedback between practical application and decision-making.
C’est ce que la solution KESTIO Live vous propose : une approche complète sur l’ensemble des axes de réflexion, une méthodologie structurée pour éviter les « trous dans la raquette » et un accompagnement dans la durée pour mettre en œuvre la stratégie définie et la faire évoluer au plus près de vos besoins et objectifs.
Once this definition work has been carried out, setting up an effective sales organization becomes much more obvious (this is what you will discover in our next article). And your car can start the race with the best chances!
To go further and learn more about the concept of social selling, and the various communication tools, you can watch this webinar:
 
				 
				 
															